Parkside Lending, Llc
San Francisco, CA · What the federal mortgage record shows about how Parkside Lending, Llc treated New Jersey applicants, 2018–2025 — 1,240 reported decisions. This is historical behavior, not a prediction about your loan.
Share of 1,240 New Jersey applications Parkside Lending, Llc approved vs. denied. Excludes loans it merely purchased on the secondary market, and applications withdrawn or left incomplete.
Approval rate by loan type
“NJ” = the statewide average approval rate for that loan type, for comparison.
Approval rate over time
Pricing
Adjusting for its loan-type mix, Parkside Lending, Llc’s rates ran +0.05 pp higher than the typical New Jersey lender (average rate spread +0.30 pp above the market benchmark). Rate spread is APR minus the average prime offer rate; positive means costlier than the low-risk benchmark.
Who Parkside Lending, Llc approves
Why Parkside Lending, Llc denied applications
Where Parkside Lending, Llc lends in NJ
| County | Decisions | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Ocean County | 352 | 77.6% |
| Essex County | 349 | 72.2% |
| Hudson County | 203 | 78.8% |
| Union County | 68 | 69.1% |
| Bergen County | 67 | 76.1% |
| Mercer County | 55 | 72.7% |
| Monmouth County | 38 | 81.6% |
Fees & closing costs
Median lender and third-party costs (the Loan Estimate’s “total loan costs”) on Parkside Lending, Llc’s home-purchase originations — 0.49 points higher than the 1.93% New Jersey median. Typical lender credit toward costs: $1,573. Excludes prepaid taxes/insurance and escrow deposits. Fees are reported on roughly two-thirds of originations (small lenders are exempt). Methodology →
Compare Parkside Lending, Llc to other lenders for your profile
Enter your income, county, DTI and down payment to see who approves borrowers like you.
Open the approval tool →Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in New Jersey reported by Parkside Lending, Llc (LEI 5493009DTDMV4MI5MT96). Rates describe past reported outcomes for the lender’s applicant pool and are not a prediction for any individual. Methodology →