Mortgage approvals in Union County, NJ
Real approval and denial rates for home-purchase mortgages in Union County, built from 44,152 federally reported lender decisions, 2018–2025.
Share of 44,152 home-purchase applications that lenders approved vs. denied · 2025: 90.7% approved. Excludes loans withdrawn, left incomplete, or bought on the secondary market.
Approval rate over time
By loan type
FHA and USDA loans serve lower-down-payment and rural buyers; approval patterns differ by program.
Lenders in Union County
Ranked by volume. Approval rate = originated or approved ÷ (those + denied), home purchases 2018–2025.
| Lender | Approval | Decisions | Denied | Avg. rate spread |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wells Fargo Bank Na Minneapolis, MN | 89.2% | 1,928 | 209 | -0.20 pp |
| United Wholesale Mortgage Pontiac, MI | 87.1% | 1,852 | 239 | +0.29 pp |
| Rocket Mortgage Detroit, MI | 83.0% | 1,528 | 260 | +0.34 pp |
| Guaranteed Rate, Inc. Chicago, IL | 95.3% | 1,524 | 72 | +0.21 pp |
| Guaranteed Rate Affinity, Llc Chicago, IL | 97.7% | 1,399 | 32 | +0.08 pp |
| Jpmorgan Chase Bank, Na Columbus, OH | 91.2% | 1,394 | 122 | -0.05 pp |
| Bank Of America Na Westlake Village, CA | 88.6% | 1,346 | 153 | -0.29 pp |
| Crosscountry Mortgage, Llc Cleveland, OH | 94.3% | 1,202 | 69 | +0.56 pp |
| Paramount Residential Mortgage Corona, CA | 89.9% | 1,146 | 116 | +0.93 pp |
| Nj Lenders Corp Little Falls, NJ | 96.5% | 1,069 | 37 | +0.20 pp |
| Loandepot.com Llc Irvine, CA | 89.7% | 1,041 | 107 | +0.39 pp |
| Caliber Home Loans, Inc. Fort Washington, PA | 91.4% | 948 | 82 | +0.61 pp |
Why applications were denied
Primary reason lenders recorded on denied applications. One denial can cite several.
See which lenders approve borrowers like you
Filter by your income, loan size and loan type to get a Union County lender shortlist.
Open the approval tool →Refinance
Best lenders for specific buyers in Union County
Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level snapshot data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in Union County, NJ. Full methodology →