Ubs Bank Usa
Salt Lake City, UT · What the federal mortgage record shows about how Ubs Bank Usa treated New Jersey applicants, 2018–2025 — 1,427 reported decisions. This is historical behavior, not a prediction about your loan.
Share of 1,427 New Jersey applications Ubs Bank Usa approved vs. denied. Excludes loans it merely purchased on the secondary market, and applications withdrawn or left incomplete.
Approval rate by loan type
“NJ” = the statewide average approval rate for that loan type, for comparison.
Approval rate over time
Pricing
Adjusting for its loan-type mix, Ubs Bank Usa’s rates ran -0.37 pp lower than the typical New Jersey lender (average rate spread -0.14 pp above the market benchmark). Rate spread is APR minus the average prime offer rate; positive means costlier than the low-risk benchmark.
Who Ubs Bank Usa approves
Why Ubs Bank Usa denied applications
Where Ubs Bank Usa lends in NJ
| County | Decisions | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Bergen County | 264 | 88.6% |
| Monmouth County | 217 | 94.9% |
| Ocean County | 162 | 92.6% |
| Morris County | 149 | 89.9% |
| Essex County | 141 | 95.0% |
| Cape May County | 101 | 88.1% |
| Union County | 71 | 97.2% |
| Hudson County | 66 | 92.4% |
Fees & closing costs
Median lender and third-party costs (the Loan Estimate’s “total loan costs”) on Ubs Bank Usa’s home-purchase originations — 1.10 points lower than the 1.93% New Jersey median. Typical lender credit toward costs: $459. Excludes prepaid taxes/insurance and escrow deposits. Fees are reported on roughly two-thirds of originations (small lenders are exempt). Methodology →
Compare Ubs Bank Usa to other lenders for your profile
Enter your income, county, DTI and down payment to see who approves borrowers like you.
Open the approval tool →Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in New Jersey reported by Ubs Bank Usa (LEI 549300GWD9H4FQ2VR805). Rates describe past reported outcomes for the lender’s applicant pool and are not a prediction for any individual. Methodology →