Kind Lending, Llc
Irvine, CA · What the federal mortgage record shows about how Kind Lending, Llc treated New Jersey applicants, 2018–2025 — 1,132 reported decisions. This is historical behavior, not a prediction about your loan.
Share of 1,132 New Jersey applications Kind Lending, Llc approved vs. denied. Excludes loans it merely purchased on the secondary market, and applications withdrawn or left incomplete.
Approval rate by loan type
“NJ” = the statewide average approval rate for that loan type, for comparison.
Approval rate over time
Pricing
Adjusting for its loan-type mix, Kind Lending, Llc’s rates ran -0.01 pp in line with than the typical New Jersey lender (average rate spread +0.45 pp above the market benchmark). Rate spread is APR minus the average prime offer rate; positive means costlier than the low-risk benchmark.
Who Kind Lending, Llc approves
Why Kind Lending, Llc denied applications
Where Kind Lending, Llc lends in NJ
| County | Decisions | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Bergen County | 139 | 76.3% |
| Passaic County | 120 | 70.8% |
| Ocean County | 117 | 72.6% |
| Essex County | 110 | 63.6% |
| Morris County | 92 | 79.3% |
| Middlesex County | 81 | 71.6% |
| Union County | 76 | 77.6% |
| Monmouth County | 66 | 80.3% |
Fees & closing costs
Median lender and third-party costs (the Loan Estimate’s “total loan costs”) on Kind Lending, Llc’s home-purchase originations — 1.32 points higher than the 1.93% New Jersey median. Typical lender credit toward costs: $5,810. Excludes prepaid taxes/insurance and escrow deposits. Fees are reported on roughly two-thirds of originations (small lenders are exempt). Methodology →
Compare Kind Lending, Llc to other lenders for your profile
Enter your income, county, DTI and down payment to see who approves borrowers like you.
Open the approval tool →Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in New Jersey reported by Kind Lending, Llc (LEI 549300MZ8VZJOVC63092). Rates describe past reported outcomes for the lender’s applicant pool and are not a prediction for any individual. Methodology →