Michigan Mutual, Inc
Port Huron, MI · What the federal mortgage record shows about how Michigan Mutual, Inc treated New Jersey applicants, 2018–2025 — 1,027 reported decisions. This is historical behavior, not a prediction about your loan.
Share of 1,027 New Jersey applications Michigan Mutual, Inc approved vs. denied. Excludes loans it merely purchased on the secondary market, and applications withdrawn or left incomplete.
Approval rate by loan type
“NJ” = the statewide average approval rate for that loan type, for comparison.
Approval rate over time
Pricing
Adjusting for its loan-type mix, Michigan Mutual, Inc’s rates ran +0.05 pp higher than the typical New Jersey lender (average rate spread +0.42 pp above the market benchmark). Rate spread is APR minus the average prime offer rate; positive means costlier than the low-risk benchmark.
Who Michigan Mutual, Inc approves
Why Michigan Mutual, Inc denied applications
Where Michigan Mutual, Inc lends in NJ
| County | Decisions | Approval |
|---|---|---|
| Bergen County | 175 | 90.9% |
| Passaic County | 130 | 92.3% |
| Middlesex County | 103 | 92.2% |
| Union County | 92 | 96.7% |
| Morris County | 74 | 91.9% |
| Essex County | 73 | 93.2% |
| Somerset County | 61 | 98.4% |
| Monmouth County | 54 | 92.6% |
Fees & closing costs
Median lender and third-party costs (the Loan Estimate’s “total loan costs”) on Michigan Mutual, Inc’s home-purchase originations — 0.90 points higher than the 1.93% New Jersey median. Typical lender credit toward costs: $1,790. Excludes prepaid taxes/insurance and escrow deposits. Fees are reported on roughly two-thirds of originations (small lenders are exempt). Methodology →
Compare Michigan Mutual, Inc to other lenders for your profile
Enter your income, county, DTI and down payment to see who approves borrowers like you.
Open the approval tool →Source: CFPB HMDA loan-level data, 2018–2025 · first-lien, closed-end mortgages on 1–4 family homes in New Jersey reported by Michigan Mutual, Inc (LEI 549300TK6RZQSFXZHV09). Rates describe past reported outcomes for the lender’s applicant pool and are not a prediction for any individual. Methodology →